Potable Water

What if you were told that you can’t drink your water?

You knew that it looked “off” in the past, but you assumed that things were okay because you trusted your water service provider, and they certainly wouldn’t allow you to be harmed.   

What if you have a private well…and noticed that your water started to look or smell different recently?  Do you just “hope” that it clears up and goes back to normal? Would you still let your children drink it?   

What if you live in the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania where there are well-documented (but less public) accounts of water-related illnesses in people, pets, and livestock BUT regulation of oil & gas exploration has seemingly made protection of public health secondary?   

Living on the east coast for most of my life, and as an environmental practitioner for 20 years, I’ve come across a broad range of sites, situations, people, and have seen surface & groundwater look as clear as a mountain stream, rusty as iced tea, and as yellow as Mountain Dew; but it usually takes “current” (and very public) drinking water issues (e.g. Flint, MI; Newark, NJ) to bring these concerns to the forefront, unfortunately.   

Because this topic can cover a lot of ground, the logical starting point is to consider whether the current local, state, and federal regulatory programs are adequate, and if the protection of our water supplies AND ultimately, human health and the environment are at the top of the list.  They certainly should be, but avoid becoming consumed by the vastness of the matter (global scale). Start by reaching out to your local public officials to educate yourself on current and future measures, programs, and initiatives in your town, county, and state because in our complex society, there will be crusaders on both sides of this battle but access to clean drinking water shouldn't be compromised. 

As contentious as this topic can be, stay tuned for future updates and musings, as well as others, from Cardinal Environmental. We hope that you find these posts informative, and relatively useful, and your feedback is always welcome. For further information please don't hesitate to contact us at tfrancis@cardinallsrp.com, or www.cardinallsrp.com.  

Drinking Water Contamination and NJDEP "Immediate Environmental Concern" Protocol

Elevated levels of 1, 2 Dichloroethane (1, 2 DCE) were detected at the Frelinghuysen (NJ) Elementary School recently, resulting in the facility to provide bottled water to students, faculty, and other staff members.  Based on what has been reported, quarterly testing is conducted at the school for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and a result of 10.5 parts per billion for 1, 2 DCE[1] was identified in January and subsequently reported to the NJDEP. The NJDEP limit is 2 parts per billion. Now, the source of the contamination has yet to be identified, but it is anticipated that the school district will investigate this matter further using their environmental consultant and NJDEP oversight.  For those that are not familiar with the “Immediate Environmental Concern (IEC)” process (which applies here) and timeframes, it is outlined as follows:

 IEC Timeframes: Potable Water  

1.     Call NJDEP (1-877-WARNDEP) or assigned case manager: Immediately

2. Notify impacted property owners, occupants, Township, & Health Departments of analytical results and mitigate (i.e. bottled water): Within 5 Days

3.  Submit IEC Response Action Form, Spreadsheet, Data, etc.: Within 14 Days

4.  Installation of Engineering System Response & Receptor Delineation: Within 60 Days

5.    Submit Engineered System Response Action Report: Within 120 Days

6.    Submit IEC Source Control Report: Within 1 year

(Note: The ATSD has indicated that 1,2 DCE[2] is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen, and commonly used in the production of vinyl chloride which is used to make a variety of plastic and vinyl products including polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes, furniture and automobile upholstery, wall coverings, housewares, and automobile parts. It is also used to as a solvent and is added to leaded gasoline to remove lead.) 

Based on first glance, it appears that the school and the NJDEP are on top of the matter, with “protection of human health, safety, and the environment” being paramount.  Additionally, the school will be submitting a report on proposed remedial measures within 30 days. Stay tuned as more information is expected to be released over the next few weeks and months.   

We hope that you find these posts informative, and relatively useful, and your feedback is always welcome. For further information, or for assistance on your next project, please don't hesitate to contact us at tfrancis@cardinallsrp.com, or www.cardinalLSRP.com.

[1] EPA VOC Methods include 1,2 DCE

[2] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

1,2 Dichloroethane-March 2011